Powered by https://sitedoctor.peoplentools.com ()
health report : https://www.epack.in/
examined at : 24-11-04 04:38:08
follow recommendations of this health report to keep your site healthy
Powered by https://sitedoctor.peoplentools.com ()
examined at : 24-11-04 04:38:08
follow recommendations of this health report to keep your site healthy
Pre Engineered Steel Buildings & Prefabricated Buildings Manufacturer - EPACK Prefab
Your page title exceeds 60 characters. It's not good.
EPACK Prefab is the leading manufacturer of pre-engineered and prefabricated steel buildings. Contact us for a free quote
Your meta description does not exceed 150 characters. It's fine.
Your site do not have any meta keyword.
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prefab | 23 | 1.938 % | No |
| EPACK | 19 | 1.601 % | No |
| Buildings | 10 | 0.842 % | No |
| Building | 10 | 0.842 % | No |
| Read | 8 | 0.674 % | No |
| DISCOVER | 8 | 0.674 % | No |
| construction | 8 | 0.674 % | No |
| Pre | 7 | 0.59 % | No |
| Engineered | 7 | 0.59 % | No |
| Sector | 7 | 0.59 % | No |
| buildings | 7 | 0.59 % | No |
| Prefabricated | 6 | 0.505 % | No |
| India | 6 | 0.505 % | No |
| Industrial | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| Panels | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| Construction | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| PEB | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| structures | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| solutions | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| READ | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPACK Prefab | 16 | 1.348 % | No |
| Pre Engineered | 7 | 0.59 % | No |
| DISCOVER MORE | 7 | 0.59 % | No |
| Read more | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| more READ | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| READ MORE | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| Engineered Buildings | 4 | 0.337 % | No |
| 2024 EPACK | 4 | 0.337 % | No |
| range of | 4 | 0.337 % | No |
| Greater Noida | 4 | 0.337 % | No |
| Prefabricated Structures | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| in the | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| quality and | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| of the | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| the construction | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| as well | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| well as | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| for a | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| About Us | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| Group Overview | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Read more READ | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| more READ MORE | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| Pre Engineered Buildings | 4 | 0.337 % | No |
| 2024 EPACK Prefab | 4 | 0.337 % | No |
| as well as | 3 | 0.253 % | No |
| Light Gauge Steel | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| Gauge Steel Framing | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| Standard Modular Solution | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| Read MoreRead more | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| a diverse range | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| diverse range of | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| range of products | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| EPACK Prefab a | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| a wide range | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| wide range of | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| Get A Quote | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| are also a | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| also a part | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| a part of | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| value for money | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Read more READ MORE | 5 | 0.421 % | No |
| Light Gauge Steel Framing | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| a diverse range of | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| a wide range of | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| are also a part | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| also a part of | 2 | 0.168 % | No |
| enquiryepackin 918130444466 Get a | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| 918130444466 Get a quote | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| Get a quote Home | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| a quote Home About | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| quote Home About Us | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| Home About Us EPACK | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| About Us EPACK Prefab | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| Us EPACK Prefab Group | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| EPACK Prefab Group Overview | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| Prefab Group Overview Products | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| Group Overview Products Pre | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| Overview Products Pre Engineered | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| Products Pre Engineered Buildings | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
| Pre Engineered Buildings MultiStorey | 1 | 0.084 % | No |
The most using keywords do not match with meta keywords.
Your site have sitemap
https://www.epack.in/sitemap_index.xml
1187
Text/HTML Ratio Test : 8%
Your site have robot.txt
NoIndex : noindex directive is a meta tag value. noindex directive is for not to show your website on search engine results. You must not set ‘noindex’ as value in meta tags if you want to be your website on search engine result.
By default, a webpage is set to “index.” You should add a <meta name="robots" content="noindex" /> directive to a webpage in the <head> section of the HTML if you do not want search engines to crawl a given page and include it in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages).
DoFollow & NoFollow : nofollow directive is a meta tag value. Nofollow directive is for not to follow any links of your website by search engine bots. You must not set ‘nofollow’ as value in meta tags if you want follow your link by search engine bots.
By default, links are set to “follow.” You would set a link to “nofollow” in this way: <a href="http://www.example.com/" rel="nofollow">Anchor Text</a> if you want to suggest to Google that the hyperlink should not pass any link equity/SEO value to the link target.
Links of your site are SEO friendly.
Site failed plain text email test.8plain text email found.
Page have doc type.
Your site have 1 images without alt text.
Your site does not have any depreciated HTML tag.
HTML page size is > 100KB
GZIP compression is disabled.
Your site have 9 inline css.
Your site have 2 internal css.
Site passed micro data schema test. 2 results found.
| SL | Host | Class | TTL | Type | PRI | Target | IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | epack.in | IN | 10800 | A | 195.35.45.162 | ||
| 2 | epack.in | IN | 3600 | NS | ns2.epack.in | ||
| 3 | epack.in | IN | 3600 | NS | ns1.epack.in | ||
| 4 | www.epack.in | IN | 10793 | CNAME | epack.in | ||
| 5 | epack.in | IN | 3600 | MX | 5 | alt2.aspmx.l.google.com | |
| 6 | epack.in | IN | 3600 | MX | 10 | alt3.aspmx.l.google.com | |
| 7 | epack.in | IN | 3600 | MX | 5 | alt1.aspmx.l.google.com | |
| 8 | epack.in | IN | 3600 | MX | 10 | alt4.aspmx.l.google.com | |
| 9 | epack.in | IN | 3600 | MX | 1 | aspmx.l.google.com |
Site failed IP canonicalization test.
Site passed URL canonicalization test.
<link rel="canonical" href="https://mywebsite.com/home" /><link rel="canonical" href="https://www.mywebsite.com/home" />
Aggregates all network requests and groups them by typeLearn More
Potential savings of 300 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn More
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn More
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn More
38 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn More
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 920 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn More
2,020 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
3.3 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
Potential savings of 110 KiB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn More
20 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn More
Potential savings of 35 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn More
Potential savings of 84 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn More
Total size was 1,333 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn More
9.0 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
18 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn More
1,865 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer Learn More
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn More
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn More
3 user timings
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn More
10 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn More
Aggregates all network requests and groups them by typeLearn More
Potential savings of 80 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn More
Potential savings of 800 KiB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn More
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn More
44 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn More
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 110 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn More
60 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
0.5 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
Potential savings of 304 KiB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn More
30 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn More
Potential savings of 1,237 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn More
Potential savings of 84 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn More
Total size was 2,846 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn More
1.7 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
18 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn More
1,794 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer Learn More
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn More
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn More
3 user timings
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn More
0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn More